CareClub was designed to give people the opportunity to connect with causes they are passionate about through an integrated, e-commerce experience.
Online donations account for over 50% of all charitable donations, but there are many inefficiencies that complicate a donor’s decision to donate — inconvenience of payment processing and lack of transparency or choice of charities — which lead to potential donors who “want to give, but find it difficult to do so.”
“Only 38% of donors who made an online gift to a nonprofit in 2016 made an online gift again to that nonprofit in 2017” (Source: doublethedonation.com)
Therefore, the decision inefficiency is leaving monetary donations on the table. These donations could have effectively helped contribute to any number of valuable causes, so we want to provide a solution where users who shop online (retail, food delivery, or other services) can customize their own donation preferences at already implemented check out processes.
Where do you mostly shop (clothes, groceries or other)? In store or online?
How often do you donate to charity? Are you or have you been involved with charities or nonprofits?
Are you part of a rewards program with your favorite retailer? If so, what are the benefits of the program (free shipping, points, etc)?
Tell me about a time when something prevented you from giving more or being charitable.
What are the main problems or barriers/frictions you face when trying to be charitable? Money (economic security)? Time-consuming, effortful process? Lack of information or options regarding causes or charities? Are they the same factors that discourage saving (dislike present losses)?
When did it happen: The interview with Joan, a head of merchandising at the B2B retail company Perry Ellis International, happened on March 29, 2021.
How did it happen: We spoke over the phone, and the interview was recorded using Otter.ai so the information gathered from the conversation could be shared with other group members easily.
We learned that B2B retailers are not viable options for this market design implementation because they don’t have an outward facing platform that can engage consumers. In terms of B2B philanthropic ventures, they still have a donation process, but it varies and does not rely on consumer donations for the most part. They tend to donate old clothes that did not sell well or were slightly damaged in the production process in lieu of strictly monetary donations. We learned that we should tweak our approach to the lack of charitable donations to a market nudge tailored to the checkout page of consumer retail businesses.
The other concept we discussed with this user persona was her experience as a consumer as well. Primarily, she pointed out that people are more willing to donate in front of other people, which sparked the idea for a community aspect to this market design nudge. She also explained that as you get older, people ask you for money everyday, so any nudge to donate to charity must be for something a person is passionate about and something we should incorporate. Even though donation fatigue is something we need to seriously consider, there is a way to work around it through engaging individual’s social network or plugging into their passions surrounding philanthropic ventures.
We learned that Rishu is open to donating a small “round-up” amount during self checkout at grocery and drug stores like Acme and CVS. This motivated our feature that would allow the user to select a preset amount or percentage of the order they are comfortable with so that they can find donating more accessible and flexible.
We also learned that college-aged donors like Rishu wants to know how the donation money is used and where it has gone towards. This motivated our idea of allowing the user to choose a cause they feel strongly about during the “one-time setup”. We also plan to provide a feature so that the user will see which project their money went towards so that the donor has the peace of mind when they donate.
Our proposed solution is a chrome extension that automates the donation process (when available at online retailers) by attempting to leverage social norms, setting a good default, and appealing to cognitive ease.
Throughout the semester, we have tried to get a comprehensive understanding of the frictions and motivations for giving. The rewards feature attempts to maximize “warm glow giving”, the economic theory that describes how people’s charitable contributions are largely driven by the selfish pleasure they receive from giving and “doing good”. Further, the latest research by John List has highlighted the “relative importance of benefits to self as a driver of giving” (https://www.nber.org/papers/w26559). A statewide field experiment, undertaken in partnership with Alaska’s Pick.Click.Give Charitable Contributions Program, found that individuals who received an appeal to self (“Warm Your Heart”) were 4.5% more likely to donate and contributed 20% more than the control group.
More specifically, we envision that the tool may suggest causes, and potentially charities, based on key impact metrics rather than simply by popularity or size. This particular feature would further appeal to the users who may have considered doing the thorough research and screening process independently to find the causes they care about and feel most attached to the measurable impact that their contribution will have.
The message displayed with the donation opportunity is yet another reminder of how good it feels to give and uses the findings of the “Warm Your Heart” experiment.
We opted for keeping a confirmation stage in the automation process following user feedback on the storyboards.
The social aspect of donating can be missed in an online setting and this social feed (inspired by Venmo) is an alternative to incorporate that. Here, our solution aims to use social norms. Research shows that individuals assess what the majority has done and attempts to behave in a manner that is fair or similar (https://directory.uleth.ca/users/debra.basil). Additionally, people who are indifferent about contributions react most strongly to information about others’ behavior and their contributions increase, on average, if they know that many others contribute (https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/0002828043052187). Displaying the names of the people and friends who have donated as well as providing an integration with social media sets up this environment.
Our project aims to make people feel more informed about their donations while doing the “most good” (effective altruism) with the least effort. We want people to feel good about being able to donate when and how they want, to the causes that they care most about.
To fulfill such goals we envision exploring an extension that will learn to understand the user, possibly by using Google and CareClub member data. Our solution could provide recommendations and suggest retailers that offer donation programs that better match the users’ desired causes. In addition, we could test a recommendation system that would prompt returning users to raise their donation commitments leveraging the “foot-in-the-door effect” and “Give More Tomorrow” findings pioneered by Richard Thaler. We also recognize that we have to make sure to build incentives for people to sign up for CareClub in the first place. This requires utilizing marketing tools on many different platforms, and also considering other incentives such as telling people we will donate a certain amount of money if they sign up.
Ultimately, the immediate next step would be to quickly deploy an MVP with the goal of maximizing the amount of feedback acquired from target users about the potential of our product idea. This will let us know if our solution solves their problem and provide a base on which to iterate. We have began designing the first prototype which is previewed below.